Bitcoin Node Can anyone help? Logs attached

Support and Troubleshooting
1

umbrel_bitcoin_2025-03-30_14-44.log (183.2 KB)

2

what’s up? Here’s an automated reply:

Let’s break down the logs you provided from the bitcoin_tor_1, bitcoin_i2pd_daemon_1, and bitcoin_server_1 services. The logs span from March 28 to March 30, 2025, and include Tor, I2P, and Bitcoin-related activity. I’ll summarize the key observations, identify potential issues, and suggest areas for investigation or resolution.

1. Tor Logs (bitcoin_tor_1)

The Tor logs show the startup and operation of a Tor node, likely used as part of a Bitcoin node’s anonymization setup. Here’s what stands out:

Key Observations:

  • Startup and Configuration:

    • Tor version 0.4.7.8 starts on March 28 at 00:28:29, running on Linux with specified libraries.
    • Configuration file /etc/tor/torrc is loaded successfully.
    • Socks listener opens on 0.0.0.0:9050 (publicly accessible) and Control listener on 0.0.0.0:9051 (also public).

  • Warnings:

    • ControlPort Exposure: The ControlPort is set to accept non-local connections (0.0.0.0:9051), which is a security risk because the control protocol is unencrypted. Tor suggests restricting it to 127.0.0.1 and using tools like stunnel or ssh for remote access.
    • SocksPort Publicly Accessible: The SocksPort (0.0.0.0:9050) is open to the internet, making the node a potential open proxy unless intended.
    • CookieAuthFileGroupReadable: This setting is ignored because no explicit CookieAuthFile is specified.

  • Bootstrapping:

    • Tor bootstraps successfully from 0% to 100% between 00:28:29 and 00:31:12 on March 28.
    • Temporary issue at 00:30:39: “No exit nodes in consensus,” limiting Tor to internal paths (e.g., onion services). This resolves by 00:30:41 when exit nodes are found.

  • Onion Service Issues:

    • Repeated “Closed 1 streams for service [scrubbed].onion for reason resolve failed. Fetch status: No more HSDir available to query” messages occur frequently (e.g., Mar 28 01:29:03 to Mar 30 14:31:52).
    • This indicates the Tor node is trying to resolve an onion address but cannot find available Hidden Service Directories (HSDirs), possibly due to network issues, misconfiguration, or unavailable relays.

  • Heartbeat Stats:

    • Periodic updates (every 6 hours) show uptime, data sent/received, and circuit counts:
      • Mar 28 06:28:30: 6 hours uptime, 56 circuits, 104.83 MB sent, 2.15 GB received.
      • Mar 30 12:28:30: 2 days 12 hours uptime, 71 circuits, 990.11 MB sent, 20.79 GB received.
    • No IPv6 connections; all activity is IPv4-based.
    • No v3 INTRODUCE2 cells received, suggesting no onion service activity initiated via this node.

Potential Issues:

  1. Security Risks:
    • Public ControlPort and SocksPort expose the node to remote reconfiguration and proxy abuse. This is a significant concern unless the node is intentionally public-facing (e.g., a relay or bridge).
  2. HSDir Resolution Failures:
    • The recurring “No more HSDir available” errors suggest connectivity issues to the Tor network or a problem with the onion service’s descriptors. This could disrupt Bitcoin transactions relying on Tor.

Suggestions:

  • Restrict ControlPort and SocksPort to 127.0.0.1 in torrc unless external access is required:
    ControlPort 127.0.0.1:9051
SocksPort 127.0.0.1:9050
  • Investigate the onion service resolution failures. Check Tor network status or increase logging verbosity (Log debug file /path/to/log) to diagnose HSDir issues.

2. I2P Logs (bitcoin_i2pd_daemon_1)

These logs are from an I2P daemon, likely used alongside Tor for Bitcoin’s privacy layer. The logs start later (Mar 30 18:49:30) and show errors.

Key Observations:

  • Gzip Deflate Errors:

    • Repeated Gzip: Deflate error 0 messages (e.g., 18:49:30 to 18:57:14) indicate compression issues during data transmission. Error 0 typically means a generic failure in zlib, possibly due to corrupted data or memory issues.

  • Tunnel Issues:

    • No outbound tunnels in the pool (e.g., 18:54:08, sSID=588322116) and Can't create inbound tunnel, no peers available (19:11:13) suggest the I2P node struggles to establish tunnels, critical for routing traffic.
    • Can't publish LeaseSet. Destination is not ready (e.g., 18:54:33) indicates the local I2P destination isn’t fully operational.

  • Network Database (NetDb) Errors:

    • Multiple entries like destination requested, but no tunnels found (e.g., 19:00:26, hash hLIKdWqJiQY-cAMQOHZmSgVevlzBqlpgKUXoYABljVA=) show the node can’t reach specific I2P destinations.
    • Signature verification failed (19:35:53) suggests a RouterInfo update failed, possibly due to network corruption or an attack.

  • SAM Errors:

    • SAM: Stream read error: Operation canceled and SAM: Read error: End of file (e.g., 19:04:18, 19:13:55) indicate issues with the SAM API, used by applications (like Bitcoin) to communicate with I2P.

  • Garlic Routing:

    • Can't handle ECIES-X25519-AEAD-Ratchet message (19:32:06) suggests a failure in processing I2P’s encrypted messages, potentially a compatibility or configuration issue.

Potential Issues:

  1. Tunnel Creation Failures:
    • The lack of inbound/outbound tunnels prevents I2P from functioning properly, likely disrupting Bitcoin’s I2P connectivity.
  2. Compression Errors:
    • Persistent Gzip: Deflate error 0 could indicate a software bug, resource exhaustion, or corrupted data.
  3. SAM and LeaseSet Issues:
    • SAM errors and LeaseSet publication failures suggest the Bitcoin node can’t reliably connect to I2P peers.

Suggestions:

  • Check I2P configuration (e.g., i2pd.conf) for tunnel settings. Increase tunnel count or bandwidth limits if constrained:
    [tunnels]
inbound.length = 3
outbound.length = 3
inbound.quantity = 5
outbound.quantity = 5
  • Restart the I2P daemon to clear potential memory or state issues.
  • Verify system resources (CPU, RAM) to rule out compression errors due to overload.
  • Enable debug logging (loglevel = debug) to pinpoint SAM and NetDb issues.

3. Bitcoin Server Logs (bitcoin_server_1)

These logs show HTTP requests to a Bitcoin node’s API, likely via Umbrel middleware, on March 30, 2025.

Key Observations:

  • API Requests:

    • Repeated GET requests to /v1/bitcoind/info/connections, /stats, and /sync from IP ::ffff:10.21.0.2 (IPv4 10.21.0.2 mapped to IPv6).
    • Most responses are 304 Not Modified, indicating no new data, with occasional 200 OK responses (e.g., 03:35:20, 67/112 bytes).

  • Timing:

    • Requests occur every 5-10 seconds (e.g., 03:34:35 to 03:36:25), suggesting a dashboard or monitoring tool polling the node.
    • Later entries jump to 19:44:44, showing continued activity.

  • User Agent:

    • Requests use a browser-like user agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) Chrome/134.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/134.0.0.0, indicating a web interface (e.g., Umbrel dashboard).

Potential Issues:

  • No explicit errors are logged, but the Bitcoin node’s reliance on Tor and I2P (showing issues above) could affect its operation indirectly.

Suggestions:

  • Correlate these timestamps with Tor/I2P errors to see if connectivity issues impact API responses.
  • If the node is unresponsive during I2P/Tor failures, adjust Bitcoin’s config to prioritize clearnet or retry mechanisms.

Overall Analysis

  • Tor: Functional but with security risks (public ports) and onion resolution issues (HSDir failures).
  • I2P: Severe connectivity problems (tunnel failures, SAM errors), likely breaking Bitcoin’s I2P routing.
  • Bitcoin Server: API is responsive, but underlying network issues may affect reliability.

Next Steps

  1. Secure Tor Configuration: Limit ports to localhost and test connectivity.
  2. Diagnose I2P: Restart the daemon, adjust tunnel settings, and check resources.
  3. Monitor Bitcoin: Ensure it falls back to clearnet if Tor/I2P fail, and verify blockchain sync status.

Let me know if you’d like deeper troubleshooting steps for any specific issue!

1 Like
3

Thanks. I’m not really sure how to do any of that where do you suggest i start after pulling up the umbrel console.

4

grab a grok.com or a chatgpt.com session and ask it to help you. I’d start by telling it what you are running in terms of hardware, software, etc., being specific about the specs.

then, once you’ve give either AI a quick orientation of your specifics, begin to ask it about your specific problem, and ask it what it needs to help you.

The reply I provided was a quick and dirty without the benefit of perspective and knowing the problem. I’m sure you’ll make much better progress with a step by step approach using AI, or documenting things here in this forum in much more detail. More is better in this case.

5

PS - AI is not always right and can lead you astray. Proceed with some critical thought vs just following what it’s telling you.